Skip to content

Swatch’s 2026 AGM: Releasing the Mainspring

Estimated Reading Time: 4 Minutes

GreenWood’s Proposals for the 2026 Swatch AGM & German Original.

GreenWood’s Engagement Presentation on AGM Proposals.

Releasing the Mainspring

In mechanical watchmaking, power is stored in the mainspring.

It is tightly wound. It is compact, controlled, and full of latent force. But that force only manifests when it can travel freely through the movement. If the gear train is obstructed, if a component seizes, or if the escapement fails to regulate energy with precision, the watch cannot keep time.

Swatch is like a wound mainspring. It holds enormous potential: iconic brands, heritage, and a central place in the history of Swiss watchmaking. Yet for more than a decade, much of that potential has remained constrained.

The issue is not the brands.

It is not the craftsmanship.

The issue is governance. And at the 2026 Annual General Meeting, GreenWood is putting forward a set of proposals designed to remove these governance constraints and restore balance at Swatch.

The Obstruction

Swatch today operates under a governance structure that concentrates power and limits accountability. Minority shareholders, who represent a majority of the company’s economic ownership, have little meaningful voice in the boardroom.

Without independent oversight, fresh perspectives, and balanced representation, even great companies can begin to malfunction like an obstructed watch movement.

We have been vocal about these issues, including a recent appearance on BloombergTV, and in an interview with NZZ, one of Switzerland’s leading publications.

For much of the past year, GreenWood stood largely alone in raising these concerns. That is no longer the case. Increasingly, Swiss media, including the publications Handelszeitung and Finanz und Wirtschaft (FuW), have turned their attention to the company’s strategy,  governance, and control structure of the founding family.

Restoring the Movement

The reforms are straightforward and widely accepted across global markets. They are not abstract governance principles, but targeted fixes to restore accountability, independence, and proper oversight at Swatch.

  1. Renominate our bearer shares representative, who was successfully elected with 62% of the vote in 2025
  2. Guarantee representation for bearer shareholders on the board through 3 representatives
  3. Require a majority of independent directors
  4. Separate the Chair of the Board from executive management
  5. Strengthen independence on key board committees
  6. Introduce auditor term limits
  7. Allow shareholders to attend AGMs both physically and virtually

None of these ideas are radical. They are the basic foundations of modern corporate governance, and they are long overdue at Swatch.

Letting the Force Flow

Swatch does not need reinvention. What it needs is a governance structure that allows its stored energy to move as it should—unobstructed, properly regulated, and running true.

The 2026 AGM is an opportunity for shareholders to help release the mainspring, and the countdown has begun for shareholders to make their voices heard.

We encourage shareholders to review our updated presentation, understand the proposals, and ensure their shares are properly registered to vote.

Sometimes the greatest transformation does not require new energy. It simply requires removing the obstruction so the movement can run.

We’re ready for Swatch to run properly again, starting with the 2026 Annual General Meeting.


Disclaimer:

This article has been distributed for informational purposes only. Neither the information nor any opinions expressed constitute a recommendation to buy or sell the securities or assets mentioned, or to invest in any investment product or strategy related to such securities or assets. It is not intended to provide personal investment advice, and it does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any person or entity that may receive this article. Persons reading this article should seek professional financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any securities or assets discussed in this article. The author’s opinions are subject to change without notice. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary research, and the information used in such process was obtained from publicly available sources. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but such reliability is not guaranteed. Investment accounts managed by GreenWood Investors LLC and its affiliates may have a position in the securities or assets discussed in this article. GreenWood Investors LLC may re-evaluate its holdings in such positions and sell or cover certain positions without notice. No part of this article may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of GreenWood Investors LLC.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

This Post Has 4 Comments

  1. Hi Steven

    I’m a shareholder of the Swatch Group and I can’t participate in this years general assembly meeting. Would you be interested in taking over my voting rights?
    If so, please let me know, how I can transmit them to you.

    Best regards
    Martin

    1. Thank you Martin! Can you send in your insurrections to the company ahead of time? That’s how most shareholders actually vote. Thank you for reaching out!

  2. Dear Mr. Wood, at last year’s Swatch Annual General Meeting, I put myself forward at short notice as a candidate to represent the registered shareholders after your candidacy was rejected by the Hayek family. The Chairwoman then stated that, as a registered shareholder, I could not represent the registered shareholders. This statement was legally incorrect, as non-shareholders can also be elected to the Board of Directors. This is currently confirmed by prominent Swiss law professors.

    In order not to jeopardize your election, I withdrew my candidacy. You then received a very impressive 62% of the votes, but were eliminated as a long-overdue candidate.

    Personally, I found it a shortcoming that you did not explain yourself and your intentions as a future member of the Board of Directors fir the good of Swatch and it’s shareholders. This is very unusual in Swiss limited liability companies AGMs. Since I hope that you will succeed this time, it would be very important in my view to address the shareholders directly.

    I am happy to answer any questions you may have and will support you and your vote. Swatch undoubtedly needs new impetus from the outside. I’m very grateful that you engage yourself for this objective abd wish you all the best for the election.

    Kind regards,
    Martin Kaufmann
    Switzerland

    1. Martin!
      Great to hear from you!
      Yes it was a mistake to not speak, something I will for sure correct this time. I do hope they allow me to speak! We’ll see!
      I wish more candidates would nominate for the seat, I think selection and choice is a good thing – including seeing you on the ballot!
      I admire your courage for standing up last time. So few will do it. Thank you!
      Please let me know if you’d like to speak at all – otherwise I’m happy to support any efforts you are thinking!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top